Definition of Impacted tooth”
White Line
The white line is drawn along the occlusal surfaces of the erupted mandibular molars & extended over the 3rd molar posteriorly. It indicates the difference in occlusal level of the 1st & 2nd molars & the 3rd molar.
Amber Line
The amber line represents the (height of the) bone level. The amber line is drawn from the surface of the bone on the distal aspect of the 3rd molar (or from the ascending ramus) to the crest of the inter dental septum twixt the 1st & 2nd molars. This line denotes the margin of the alveolar bone covering the 3rd molar and gives some indication to the amount of bone that will need to be removed for the
tooth to come out.
Red Line
The red line is an imaginary line drawn perpendicular from the amber line to an imaginary point of application of an elevator. Usually, this is the cemento-enamel junction on the mesial aspect of the impacted tooth (unless, it is the disto-angular impacted tooth where the application point is the distal cemento-enamel junction). The red line indicates the amount of bone that will have to be removed before elevation of the tooth i.e. the depth of the tooth in the jaw & the difficulty encountered in removing the tooth.
With each increase in length of the red line by 1mm, the impacted tooth becomes 3 x more difficult to remove (as opined by Howe). If the red line is < 5mm, than the tooth can be removed under just LA; anything above, a GA or LA Sedation would be more appropriate.
An impacted tooth is any 
tooth that is prevented from reaching its normal position in the mouth by 
tissue, bone, or another tooth.
Of the surgical procedures 
performed in the oral cavity, the removal of impacted and semi-impacted teeth is 
the most common. The extraction of these teeth, depending on their localization, 
may prove to be relatively easy or extremely difficult and laborious. Regardless 
of the degree of difficulty of the surgical procedure though, its success 
primarily depends on correct preoperative evaluation and planning, as well as on 
the treatment of complications that may arise during the procedure, or the 
management of complications that may present after the surgical procedure. For 
these reasons, a medical history, clinical examination of the patient, and 
radiographic evaluation of the area surrounding the impacted tooth are deemed 
necessary.
Indications for removal of 
impacted tooth
Specialists have divergent points of view concerning the 
necessity to extract impacted teeth. Certain people suggest that the removal of 
impacted teeth is necessary as soon as their presence is confirmed, which is 
usually by chance. They even believe that it must be done as soon as possible, 
as long as there is no possibility that the impacted tooth may be brought into 
alignment in the dental arch using a combination of orthodontic and surgical 
techniques. On the other hand, others suggest that the preventive removal of 
asymptomatic impacted teeth, besides subjecting the patient to undue discomfort, 
entails the risk of causing serious local complications (e.g., nerve damage, 
displacement of the tooth into the maxillary sinus, fracture of the maxillary 
tuberosity, loss of support of adjacent teeth, etc.). As far as impacted teeth 
that have already caused problems are concerned,everyone agrees that they should 
be removed, regardless of the degree of difficulty of the surgical procedure. 
The most common of these problems are now given.
Pericoronitis in a 
semi-impacted mandibular third molar. Diagrammatic illustration showing 
inflammation under the operculum and distal to the crown of the tooth.
Clinical photograph. 
Characteristic swelling of the operculum due to constant biting from the 
antagonist
Localized or Generalized Neuralgias of the 
Head(Prevention of pain of unexplained origin.
Impacted teeth may be 
responsible for a variety of symptoms related to headaches and various types of 
neuralgias. If this is the case, the pain may be due to pressure exerted by the 
impacted tooth where it comes into contact with many nerve endings. Many people 
suggest that the symptoms may subside after the removal of the offending tooth, 
which basically involves ectopic impacted teeth.
Pericoronitis.
This is an acute infection of 
the soft tissues covering the semi-impacted tooth and the associated follicle. 
This condition may be due to injury of the operculum (soft tissues covering the 
tooth) by the antagonist third molar or because of entrapment of food under the 
operculum, resulting in bacterial invasion and infection of the area. After 
inflammation occurs, it remains permanent and causes acute episodes from time to 
time. It presents as severe pain in the region of the affected tooth,which 
radiates to the ear, temporomandibular joint, and posterior submandibular 
region. Trismus, difficulty in swallowing, submandibular lymphadenitis, rubor, 
and edema of the operculum are also noted. A characteristic of pericoronitis is 
that when pressure is applied to the operculum, severe pain and discharge of pus 
are observed. Acute pericoronitis is often responsible for the spread of 
infection to various regions of the neck and facial area.
Production of Caries. 
Entrapment of food particles 
and bad hygiene, due to the presence of the semi-impacted tooth, may cause 
caries at the distal surface of the second molar, as well as on the crown of the 
impacted tooth itself.
Decreased Bone Support of Second Molar. 
The well-timed extraction of a 
semi-impacted tooth presenting a periodontal pocket ensures the avoidance of 
resorption of the distal bone aspect of the second molar, which would result in 
a decrease of its support.
Obstruction of Placement of a Partial or 
Complete 
Denture. 
The impacted teeth of 
edentulous patients can erupt towards the residual alveolar ridge, creating 
problems when applying a prosthesis. The localization of the tooth is often 
observed after its communication with the oral cavity and the presence of pain 
and edema.
Obstruction of the Normal Eruption of Permanent 
Teeth. 
Impacted teeth and 
supernumerary teeth often hinder the normal eruption of permanent 
teeth, creating functional and esthetic problems.
Provoking or Aggravating Orthodontic 
Problems.
Lack of roomin the arch is 
possibly themost common indication for extraction, primarily of impacted and 
semi-impacted third molars of the maxilla and mandible.
Participation in the Development of Various Pathologic 
Conditions.
The coexistence of an impacted 
tooth and various pathologic conditions is not an uncommon phenomenon. Often 
cystic lesions develop around the crown of the tooth and are depicted on the 
radiograph as different-sized radiolucencies. These cysts may be large and may 
displace the impacted tooth to any position in the jaw. Whenthe presence of such 
osteolytic lesions is verified radiographically, they must be removed together 
with the associated impacted tooth.
Destruction of Adjacent Teeth Due to Resorption of Roots. 
Resorption of the roots of 
adjacent teeth is another undesirable situation that may be caused by the 
impacted tooth; the effect isbrought about through pressure. This case primarily 
involves the posterior teeth of the maxilla and mandible. It begins with 
resorption of the distal root and, eventually, may totally destroy the tooth. 
The resorption of rootsmay also be observed in other areas of the dental arch 
and may involve dental surfaces other than those mentioned above. Having 
mentioned the undesirable situations that are associated with impacted teeth, 
and given the fact that no one can guarantee that an asymptomatic impacted tooth 
will not create problems in the future, the choice of removing or preserving the 
impacted tooth must be made after considering all the possibilities.
Prevention of fracture of jaws
Prevention of Periodontal Disease
Caries on the distal surface 
of the second molar, caused by a semi-impacted mandibular thirdmolar
Caries in the distal area of 
the crown of semi impacted third molar, due to entrapment of food and bad 
hygiene
Bone resorption at the 
distal surface of the root of a mandibular second molar, resulting in a 
periodontal pocket
Impacted mandibular third 
molar in edentulous area, which erupted after placement of a partial 
denture
Obstruction of the eruption 
of a mandibular second molar because of an impacted third molar
Impacted maxillary central 
incisor, whose eruption was obstructed because of a supernumerary 
tooth
Impacted mandibular third 
molar with well-defined radiolucency at the distal area
Impacted mandibular canine 
that is surrounded by a lesion
Extensive radiolucent lesion 
in the posterior area of the mandible, occupying the ramus. The impacted tooth 
has been displaced to the inferior border of the mandible.
Extensive radiolucent lesion 
in the mandible, extending from the mandibular notch as far as the canine. The 
impacted tooth has been displaced to an area high in the ramus of the 
mandible
Complete resorption of the 
distal root of the left mandibular firstmolar, due to an impacted second 
molar
Medical 
History
A detailed medical history is necessary because, based on 
the information provided, useful information may be found concerning the general 
health of the patient to be operated on. This information determines the 
preoperative preparation of the patient, as well as the postoperative care 
instructions.
Clinical 
Examination
During the intraoral clinical examination, the degree of 
difficulty of access to the tooth is determined, especially concerning impacted 
third molars. When the patient cannot open his or her mouth, because of trismus 
that is mainly due to inflammation, the trismus is treated first, and extraction 
of the third molar is performed at a later date. In certain cases of impacted 
teeth, especially canines, buccal or palatal protuberance may be observed during 
palpation or even inspection, which suggests that the impacted tooth is located 
underneath. Also, the adjacent teeth are examined and inspected (extensive 
caries, large amalgam restorations, prosthetic appliance, etc.) to ensure their 
integrity during manipulations with various instruments during the extraction 
procedure.
Radiographic 
Examination
The radiographic examination provides us with all the 
necessary information to program and correctly plan the surgical removal of 
impacted teeth. This information includes: position and type of impaction, 
relationship of impacted tooth to adjacent teeth, size and shape of impacted 
tooth, depth of impaction in bone, density of bone surrounding impacted tooth, 
and the relationship of the impacted tooth to various anatomic structures, such 
as the mandibular canal, mental foramen, and the maxillary sinus. These 
aforementioned data may also be provided by periapical radiographs and panoramic 
radiographs, as well as occlusal radiographs.
Assessment and Classification of Impacted third 
molar
Impacted Third Molar Classification. 
The impacted mandibular third 
molar may present with 
various positions in the bone, and 
so the technique for its removal is determined by its localization. The classic 
positions of the tooth, depending 
on the direction of the crown of the tooth, are (according to Archer 1975; 
Kruger 1984): mesioangular, 
distoangular, vertical, horizontal, buccoangular, linguoangular, and inverted. 
Impacted teeth may also 
be classified according to their depth of impaction, their proximity to the second 
molar, as well as their 
localization in terms of the distance between the distal aspect of the second 
molar and the anterior border 
of the ramus of themandible. As far as the depth of impaction is concerned, 
mandibular third molars may 
be classified (according to Pell and Gregory 1933) as belonging to three 
categories:
Class A: The occlusal 
surface of the impacted tooth is at the same level as, or a little below that 
of, the second molar.
Class B: The occlusal 
surface of the impacted tooth is at the middle of the crown of the second molar 
or at the same level as the cervical line.
Class C: The occlusal 
surface of the impacted tooth is below the cervical line of the second molar As 
for the distance to the anterior border of the ramus of the mandible, impacted 
teeth may be classified as belonging to one of the following three 
categories:
Classification of impaction 
of mandibular third molars, according to Archer (1975) and Kruger (1984). 
(1Mesioangular, 
2 distoangular, 
3 vertical, 
4 horizontal, 
5 buccoangular, 
6 linguoangular, 
7 
inverted)
Class 1: The distance 
between the second molar and the anterior border of the ramus is greater than 
the mesio distal diameter of the crown of the impacted tooth, so that its 
extraction does not require bone removal from the region of the ramus.
Class 2: The distance is 
less and the existing space is less than the mesiodistal diameter of the crown 
of the impacted tooth.
Class 3: There is no 
room between the second molar and the anterior border of the ramus, so that the 
entire impacted tooth or part of it is embedded in the ramus.
Classification of impacted 
mandibular third molars according to Pell and Gregory (1933): a according to the 
depth of impaction and proximity to the second molar; b their position 
according to the distance between the secondmolar and the anterior border of the 
ramus of the mandible
The above classification 
methods refer to all of the aforementioned positions of the impacted tooth. 
Furthermore, the number of roots of the impacted tooth and their relationship to 
the mandibular canal are taken into consideration. It is obvious that the cases 
belonging to Class 3 present more difficulty during the surgical procedure, 
because the extraction of the tooth requires removal of a relatively large 
amount of bone and there is a risk of fracturing the mandible and damaging the 
inferior alveolar nerve.
Winter's Lines (WAR)
The position & depth of the mandibular 3rd molar can be determined using the Winter’s Lines (WAR). These are 3 imaginary lines (red, amber & white) “drawn” on the dental X-ray (these days, normally an OPG / DPT).
The position & depth of the mandibular 3rd molar can be determined using the Winter’s Lines (WAR). These are 3 imaginary lines (red, amber & white) “drawn” on the dental X-ray (these days, normally an OPG / DPT).
White Line
The white line is drawn along the occlusal surfaces of the erupted mandibular molars & extended over the 3rd molar posteriorly. It indicates the difference in occlusal level of the 1st & 2nd molars & the 3rd molar.
Amber Line
The amber line represents the (height of the) bone level. The amber line is drawn from the surface of the bone on the distal aspect of the 3rd molar (or from the ascending ramus) to the crest of the inter dental septum twixt the 1st & 2nd molars. This line denotes the margin of the alveolar bone covering the 3rd molar and gives some indication to the amount of bone that will need to be removed for the
tooth to come out.
Red Line
The red line is an imaginary line drawn perpendicular from the amber line to an imaginary point of application of an elevator. Usually, this is the cemento-enamel junction on the mesial aspect of the impacted tooth (unless, it is the disto-angular impacted tooth where the application point is the distal cemento-enamel junction). The red line indicates the amount of bone that will have to be removed before elevation of the tooth i.e. the depth of the tooth in the jaw & the difficulty encountered in removing the tooth.
With each increase in length of the red line by 1mm, the impacted tooth becomes 3 x more difficult to remove (as opined by Howe). If the red line is < 5mm, than the tooth can be removed under just LA; anything above, a GA or LA Sedation would be more appropriate.
Another 
method of judging the depth of the 3rd molar is to divide the root of the 2nd 
molar into thirds.  A horizontal line is drawn from the point of application for 
an  elevator to the 2nd molar.  If the point of 
application is adjacent to the coronal, middle or apical root third, then the 
tooth extraction is assessed as easy, moderate or difficult 
respectively.
Steps of Surgical Procedure
The surgical procedure for the 
extraction of impacted teeth includes the following steps:
1. Incision and reflection of 
the mucoperiosteal flap
2. Removal of bone to expose 
the impacted tooth
3. Luxation of the tooth
4. Care of the postsurgical 
socket and suturing of the wound
The main factors for a 
successful outcome to the surgical procedure are as follows:
·         Correct flap design, 
which must be based on the clinical and radiographic examination (position of 
tooth, relationship of roots to anatomic structures, root morphology).
·         Ensuring the pathway 
for removal of the impacted tooth, with as little bone removal as possible. This 
is achieved when the tooth is sectioned and removed in segments, which causes 
the least trauma possible.
Principles of Mucoperiosteal 
flap design
1.       Preservation of blood 
supply
2.       Adequate access
3.       Prevent damage to vital 
structures
4.       Incision margins should lie on 
sound bony margins
5.       Ease of repositioning
Types of Flaps. 
According to the type of 
incision
·         Envelope
·         Two sided
·         Three sided
·         Apically repositioned 
flap
·         Semilunar
According to the 
thickness
·         Full thickness
·         Partial 
thickness
According to the 
site
·         Labial or buccal 
flap
·         Palatal or Lingual 
flap
Many types of flaps may be used 
when surgically removing impacted mandibular third molars: the triangular and 
the envelope flap are the commonest using flaps. The choice depends on the 
evaluation of the various data pertaining to the case (e.g., depth of impaction, 
position, etc.).
Triangular flap:
The incision for this type of 
flap begins at the anterior border of the ramus (external oblique ridge) with 
special care for the lingual nerve and extends as far as the distal aspect of 
the second molar, while the vertical releasing incision is made obliquely 
downwards and forward, ending in the vestibular fold In certain cases, e.g., 
when impaction is deep, to ensure a satisfactory surgical field or when the 
impacted tooth conceals the roots of the second molar, the incision may continue 
along the cervical line of the last tooth while the vertical incision begins at 
the distal aspect of the first molar. 
Variation of incision shown 
in figure (vertical releasing incision is distal to the first molar). The mesial 
extension of incision is necessary due to the position of the third molar 
compared to the second molar
Horizontal (envelope) 
flap:
The incision for the flap also 
begins at the anterior border of the ramus and extends as far as the distal 
aspect of the second molar, continuing along the cervical lines of the last two 
teeth, and ending at the mesial aspect of the first molar. This type of flap is 
usually used in cases where impaction is relatively superficial.
Clinical photograph and 
b 
diagrammatic illustration showing incision for envelope 
flap
Anesthesia. 
Anesthesia in cases of impacted 
mandibular third molars is achieved by: inferior alveolar nerve block, buccal 
nerve block, lingual nerve block, and local infiltration for hemostasis in the 
surgical field.
Techniques of bone removal
·         Use of 
Burs
·         Use of chisel and 
mallet
Bone removal with 
burs-Points to remember
·         Copius 
irrigation
·         Protect vital 
structures
Principles of closure of flaps
·         Gentle tissue 
handling
·         Not too tight 
sutures
·         Haemostasis prior to 
closing
·         Avoid dead 
space
·         Decontamination and 
debridement
·         Proper 
approximation





















No comments:
Post a Comment